May 7, 2009

Fallacies of Knowledge Management: Summary

4 Comments:

Blogger Nick Milton said...

I am not sure I completely agree with your number one.

In the 90s, when Schlumberger were testing the idea of KM, they started with Communities and community shared spaces. The invited senior managers to use the functionality, and challenged them to find people and information that had perviously been hidden. The managers were struck by how simple this was, and gave enthusiastic support to KM. The success of the Schlumberger program is now a well known case study.

Sometimes you have to prime the pump!

(I agree rather more with one or two of your other fallacies by the way)

07 May, 2009  
Blogger Saager Mhatre said...

In addition to @Nick's observation on #1 above, it seems to contradict #6; while #1 seems to promote "read and throw" over "bookmark and tag", #6 wants to turn users away from read and throw.

10 May, 2009  
Blogger Sriram said...

@Nick
That's interesting. I think most knowledge centric organizations today suffer from a surfeit of information (of uneven quality) rather than scarcity. Hence my post. Secondly, I wouldn't attribute the success of a big program to any one activity. Of course, you might have much more context than what you have shared here.

@Saager
#1 is about not focusing on the collecting of information. I didn't say organizations should not collect at all.

11 May, 2009  
Blogger OJAS said...

I read your blog and found it very informative. The event blogs are striking enough to have a feel of the event, so, I would like to have a little chit-chat on your blogging interests. And even we are coming up with an event on startups on June 6th. So, can I have your contact details? Looking forward to hear from you.
Contact me at ojas@siliconindia.com

30 May, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home